View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2005, 08:55 AM
Cincinnati's Avatar
Cincinnati Cincinnati is offline
Senior Member
Not an owner yet
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 437
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
After reading all the posts on this, I'm inclined to agree that it appears that there is a defect associated with the hull on these particular boats.

But I would like to point out one observation. I went out this morning to look at my upper bunk placement in comparison to the pics you folks have been posting. I appears that btoups1122 and inspector2359 - your upper bunks are all the way up on the modified potion of the hull. The front of my upper bunks are down further on the lower hull.

This weekend I'll go out and measure the exact location of my bunks. When looking at my boat, if my upper bunks were placed where yours are, it appears that the lower bunks would be supporting all of the weight and, therefore, the hull would flex until the upper part of the lower hull rested on the upper bunks.

I'll also try to get pictures.
Reply With Quote