![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Visitors | Forums | Photos | Articles | Classifieds | Reviews | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Register | Info |
| Triumph 170 Discussion of the 170 series |
| Welcome to the Triumph Boat Owners Network forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to our "Visitors" page and to view Classified Ads from our members. If you currently own a Triumph or Logic Boat we welcome you to register and join our Captains Club in order to participate in our forums. As a Captains Club Member you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view and upload photos in our Photo Gallery, respond to polls, upload content, user our free Classified Ads and access many other special features. But you must own a Triumph or Logic Boat in order to register as a member. We are currently offering a free 1-year subscription to the Captains Club to Triumph Boat Owners. If you choose to renew your subscription the following year the renewal fee is only $15.00. Our registration system is moderated and you must enter all the information requested in order to join our Triumph Boat Owner Captains Club. If you own a Triumph or Logic Boat we invite you to join our community today! You can learn more about the Captains Club here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| Visit Our Sponsor | |
![]() |
|
| Interested in advertising with us? | |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
BAYCOASTAL,
I have a 2004 170CC with a 60hp Yamaha 4 stroke. I love my setup.It is perfect for my use. It's just my wife and myself that uses the boat or a fishing buddy and myself. The 25% of the time you are trying to stuff your family of five on the 170 you would be wishing you were on the 190 bay with tons of storage and the bigger motor. I would at least get the maximum HP for the 170 if you purchase it. (75HP). If I could afford the extra cost with a family of five to please I would get the 190 bay with the largest 4 stroke I could afford. I would leave the T- top off and put the money on the motor. Just my 2 cents. You'll probably get several opinions. Good luck with your decision. You'll love these plastic boats!!! John D. |
|
|||
|
190 Bay
Hi,
I just read your post, and I too have been dealing with the same dilemma. Instead of purchasing a new 170, I opted to buy a 2004 190Bay. After searching for about a month... I found one in great shape with a Yamaha 115 four strke for 15,000! I see now that the 190 has alot more than just the length. It has great storage, and alot more room to lay around. Just my 2 cents. Joe by the way... Mine didnot have a T top, but I figure I can add one later and still save some$$$ |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have the 170CC with a 60hp 2 stroke. I use the boat primarily for fishing in freshwater rivers with either my wife along or by myself...a perfect setup. I also have two teenage boys and have taken up to six people tubing (2 adults, 4 kids) and had plenty of power for it. However, if I were to use it for more cruising/tubing than fishing I would opt for the larger boat and more HP. The four of us can fish out of my boat O.K. but we need to be careful not to sling a hook into someone when casting. Getting back to the question of if the 170CC is big enough, the answer is...it depends. If you are sticking to calm bays and inland lakes/rivers you could get by. Eventually, though, you are going to run into a situation that you will be wanting a larger boat. Whether it's rough water or more people or just more storage, it will come. I would recommend going with the 190...I don't know of many people that eventually want a smaller boat. I hope this helps.
__________________
170CC Owner (Name: Effie) Chuck Thanks, Dad, for taking the time to show me how to fish!! |
|
|||
|
Baycoastal,
I'm awaiting delivery on a 170 with a 60 yammi (should be ready this week) and 90% of the time I'll be fishing alone or with one other person but occasionally I'll use it for tubing/skiing and I still wonder if I should have gotten the 190 with a 115. The main reasons I ended up going with the 170 was I felt it would be a whole lot easier launching it by myself as opposed to launching the 190 and the amount of fuel the 190 burns (approximately 10 gallons per hour at cruising speed vs. approximately 4 ghp at cruising speed for the 170). You didn't say how old the kids are but they will grow if they aren't big already. For the difference in the price I would lean toward the 190 but regardless of which boat you end up purchasing get the swim platfrom. Regardless of which boat you end up getting, enjoy it and the time spent on it with family and friends because it passes too quickly. |
|
|||
|
170 vs 190
I also had some of the same thoughts about getting the bigger boat. In the end i decided that for most of my use I only needed the 170.
As far as the motor goes... I would seriously look at the 75 etec. My understaning is that it is pushing more like 90 hp. It's better to have the HP and not need it than vice versa. I love mine so far and am glad I didn't opt for less power. |
|
|||
|
170 vs 190
good article on e-tecs at www.oceanskiffjournal.com
|
|
|||
|
I just took delivery of a 170 CC with a Yamaha 60 four-stroke and gave it a sea trial the other day. Its so quiet at idle its hard to tell if its running. Ultra low emissions too so theres not a hint of blue smoke. And this 170 package is lighter, easier to load and haul on a trailer, and over 3 feet shorter on a trailer if youre thinking of storing it in a garage. My wife and I can launch and load the 170 easily (she supervises and remembers the little details like screwing in the drain plugs etc.
If weight, trailerability and garage limitiations arent big factors, nor $$$ either, the 190 with a 115 Yamaha four stroke--also a great motor--would be the way to go imo. The 170 with 60 hp isnt going to be a rocket, thats for sure, in terms of pulling a skier. I wish you could legally install a Nissan 90 direct fuel injection on a 170 CC. It weighs only about 310 lbs as I recall. Nissan is the only brand that might be a little more bulletproof than Yamaha--good thing too, since Nissan mechanics can be hard to find. One other advantage of a 170CC over the 190 bay: significantly shallower draft, which is important if you fish in close to shoals. |
|
||||
|
As an owner of a 170cc, I would recomend going w/the 190. Don't get me wrong I love my little boat but room and storage space is a big issue. Even with only myself and one fishing buddy it can get cramped after a full day on the water. The reason my family bought the 170 was because of the deal we got on it(dealer leftover), even with the space problem I still would not trade it for any other boat, except maybe a 190bay.
![]() Brian
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/brk009 |
|
|||
|
Well, I've never been in a 190 Bay, or even seen one. But, if I was looking to boat a family of 5 I'd look at a Tahoe Q7i or 196. You can see them in the Bass Pro Shops catalog. Yeah, I know it's not a Triumph and I own a 17 bass, but I'd want the power, seating and storage the Tahoe's offer and I'd put up with the maintenance. Besides, they would still be great fishing boats. Ah, such blasphemy!
woodNfish |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Great Deal on 2005 170CC!!!! | SYBoathouse | Dealer and Vendor Forum | 4 | 03-06-2007 05:34 PM |
| 90hp 4stroke on 170cc? | MSANDEL | Triumph 170 | 11 | 04-22-2006 07:56 AM |
| 170CC Leaning Post | blacter | Triumph 170 | 12 | 03-06-2006 05:30 PM |
| Mounting a downrigger on the 170cc.... | Pip | Triumph 170 | 0 | 03-08-2005 05:55 PM |
| '02 170CC modification photos added | mtty | Triumph 170 | 6 | 02-20-2005 06:44 PM |